 |
| A Return to Modesty: Discovering the Lost Virtue by Wendy Shalit |
Since respect for her modesty gave her the freedom to withhold affection, so to speak, until a virtuous man came around, men were in turn inspired to become worthy of her. {p. 98}
Today our society makes fun of modesty, and then we are surprised to find our men behaving abominably. {p. 104}
Hume’s contemporary, Rousseau, recognized right away that defending modesty in utilitarian terms alone was just one step away from seeking its extinction. What happens to a notion founded on mere utility when it is someday deemed useless? {p. 109}
Since a woman’s modesty made her so evidently different from men, if women were to strive to be the same as men, of course modesty would have to be the first to go. {p. 111}
[M]odesty is so threatening to the egalitarians because whenever it emerges, it is evidence. It is evidence that woman’s experience of love and sex is fundamentally different from man’s, and as such it rebukes the androgynous project. {p. 112}
[T]he reason for modesty is not that women have any less s*x drive than men, but that it is of a different kind. {p. 115}
Could Rousseau have been right in saying that when the differences between the sexes are appreciated, each s*x needs the other, and when women pretend to be men, men tend to need them less? {p. 120}
It’s natural. If modesty were not natural, but inculcated into women, then the older and more cultured a woman got, the more modest we could expect her to be. But instead, the opposite seems to be true. Girls seem to become instinctively modest around boys as soon as they hit puberty, and our culture teaches them that this is a problem. {p. 125}
Kant thought that since modesty flows from the natural circumstances of women, and is not the result of any rational struggle, it couldn’t qualify as moral: “The girl is not so much virtuous as she has the capacity to make men virtuous.” {p. 127}
Not only do we think there are differences between the sexes, but we think these differences can have a beautiful meaning–a meaning that isn’t some irrelevant fact about us but one that can inform and guide our lives. {p. 140}
In order to court women men must, in some sense, need to court women. Do people imagine men courted women in the past because they simply found it more fun than casual s*x? No, it was because women’s modesty required it. {p. 146, emphasis mine}
Surely the egalitarians never intended to take away freedoms women already enjoyed. But once an idea is in common currency, it doesn’t matter whether the consequences were intended or not; the idea drifts into the culture in ways no one anticipated, and the damage must be assessed. {p. 158}
2 Comments