Get the exclusive (almost) Weekly Digest.

    Educational Philosophy, Mother's Education

    Jane Healy and Charlotte Mason

    May 23, 2013 by Brandy Vencel

    For a number of years, I kept hearing that the AmblesideOnline Advisory really liked this book called Endangered Minds. So I put it on my wishlist and forgot about it. Until I got a match, of course, and then the book arrived. I happened to be in a reading slump at the time, and so I picked it up to see if it could cure me.

    Needless to say, I can see why they appreciate the book! Chock full of research on the development of the human brain, Healy essentially proves that Charlotte Mason was on the right track. This was especially interesting to me because just today I encountered the comment that “times are changing and surely Charlotte Mason would have changed with them.”

    Well, yes and no.

    Drawing a parallel between what Jane Healy observed about children in the 1990s with what Charlotte Mason observed about children in 1890s. Or something.

    Some ideas in Charlotte Mason’s volumes are, I think, truly a product of her place and time. When it come to those things, I’m sure she would change or at least update what she said and did. We know that she changed over time, which is why there is such a vast difference in what she says about, for example, mathematics between her first and final volumes.

    But much of what she says is not hers. It belongs to the conversation folks have been having about education for centuries — for millennia. To the extent that what Miss Mason said was touching on the Permanent Things, then no. These things are, by definition, things that do not change with time.

    I try to base my approach to education upon things I do not need research to prove to me. I know, for example, that children are persons because, first and foremost, I believe this is self-evident. Beyond that, it isn’t that Miss Mason said so, but that Jesus said children were capable of coming to Him, and that of such is the Kingdom of Heaven. Naturally, the Kingdom consists of persons. When Miss Mason wrote in her first principle that “children are born persons” I loved it because it was true; not because it came from her.

    She had a knack for truth.

    Back in the 1990s, Jane Healy went on a mission to figure out why children are so different — so difficult to teach compared to, say, the 1950s, and possibly all of human history. She doesn’t phrase it exactly this way, but she’s trying to find out what is wrong with them. What she finds is not only interesting, amazing, and, sadly, not unexpected, but it is also a confirmation of what Miss Mason wrote oh so many years ago.

    I thought I’d give you a sampling by juxtaposing some quotes. My only struggle here was choosing which ones, there were so many!

    On Brain Ruts

    We think, as we are accustomed to think; ideas come and go and carry on a ceaseless traffic in the rut — let us call it — you have made for them in the very nerve substance of the brain.

    [snip]

    This relation of habit to human life — as the rails on which it runs to a locomotive — is perhaps the most suggestive and helpful to the educator; for just as it is on the whole easier for the locomotive to pursue its way on the rails than to take a disastrous run off them, so it is easier for the child to follow lines of habit carefully laid down than to run off these lines at his peril. It follows that this business of laying down lines towards the unexplored country of the child’s future is a very serious and responsible one for the parent. It rests with him to consider well the tracks over which the child should travel with profit and pleasure; and, along these tracks, to lay down lines so invitingly smooth and easy that the little traveller is going upon them at full speed without stopping to consider whether or no he chooses to go that way.

    Vol. 1, p. 109-110

    [W]hat children do every day, the ways in which they think and respond to the world, what they learn, and the stimuli to which they decide to pay attention — shapes their brains. Not only does it change the ways in which the brain is used (functional change), but it also causes physical alterations (structural change) in neural wiring systems.

    p. 51

    Old Habits Die Hard

    But, supposing that the doing of a certain action a score or two of times in unbroken sequence forms a habit which it is as easy to follow as not; that, persist still further in the habit without lapses, and it becomes second nature, quite difficult to shake off; continue it further, through a course of years, and the habit has the strength of ten natures, you cannot break through it without doing real violence to yourself…

    Vol. 1, p. 110

    It is much more difficult, however, to reorganize a brain than it is to organize it in the first place. “Organization inhibits reorganization,” say the scientists. Carving out neuronal tracks for certain types of learning is best accomplished when the synapses for that particular skill are most malleable, before they “firm up” around certain types of responses.

    p. 53

    Self-Education

    No one knoweth the things of a man but the spirit of a man which is in him; therefore, there is no education but self-education, and as soon as a young child begins his education he does so as a student.

    Vol. 6, p. 26

    Over thirty years ago I published a volume about the home education of children and people wrote asking how those counsels of perfection could be carried out with the aid of the private governess as she then existed; it occurred to me that a series of curricula might be devised embodying sound principles and securing that children should be in a position of less dependence on their teacher than they then were; in other words, that their education should be largely self-education. A sort of correspondence school was set up, the motto of which, — “I am, I can, I ought, I will,” has had much effect in throwing children upon the possibilities, capabilities, duties and determining power belonging to them as persons.

    Vol. 6, p. 28-29

    In urging a method of self-education for children in lieu of the vicarious education which prevails, I should like to dwell on the enormous relief to teachers, a self-sacrificing and greatly overburdened class; the difference is just that between driving a horse that is light and a horse that is heavy in hand; the former covers the ground of his own gay will and the driver goes merrily. The teacher who allows his scholars the freedom of the city of books is at liberty to be their guide, philosopher and friend; and is no longer the mere instrument of forcible intellectual feeding.

    Vol. 6, p. 32

    Therefore, teaching, talk and tale, however lucid or fascinating, effect nothing until self-activity be set up; that is, self-education is the only possible education; the rest is mere veneer laid on the surface of a child’s nature.

    Vol. 6, p. 240

    There is no education but self-education and only as the young student works with his own mind is anything effected.

    Vol. 6, p. 289

    I often ask myself when I am struggling to “make” a student learn something, Whose brain is growing today? It always helps to consider: Who is interested? Who is curious? Who is asking the questions? Children need stimulation and intellectual challenges, but they must be actively involved in their learning, not responding passively while another brain — their teacher’s or parent’s — laboriously develops new synapses in their behalf.

    p. 73

    Too much “teacher talk” gets in the way of such higher-level reasoning because it prevents children from doing their own thinking!

    p. 96

    I could go on, but I’ll stop.

    This book has been so encouraging to me. Sometimes what we do here on the microhomestead can seem “slow” or “backwards” because so much (and yet so little) is asked of young children today. I try to remind myself that as a culture we are graduating people of less and less quality, so asking more does not equal being more in terms of the caliber of the person at the end of the process.

    Get the (almost) weekly digest!

    Weekly encouragement, direct to your inbox, (almost) every Saturday.

    Powered by ConvertKit

    8 Comments

  • Reply Ellie August 9, 2014 at 2:18 am

    thank you for this post, I googled Jane Healy and Charlotte Mason and am so glad we think alike on so many things that it brought me to your lovely blog. I am bookmarking this to reread later becasue I am falling asleep at the laptop after a long day. Thank you, thank you!

    • Reply Brandy Vencel August 9, 2014 at 2:34 am

      Are you reading Healy right now, Ellie? She’s pretty great. I have one of her other books sitting in my pile, but haven’t read it yet…I would like to know someday what she thinks of things that were invented after this book, like smart phones and iPods and such. 🙂

      Sweet dreams. 🙂

  • Reply Marianne June 8, 2013 at 4:45 am

    There is no education but self-education and only as the young student works with his own mind is anything effected. {vol. 6, p. 289}

    What an amazing quote. I really love that.
    That is why we really need to find what our kids like, where their strengths are – find out what makes them tick and build their education around that! Then, applaud, encourage, guide, provide resources, stimulate and stand in awe.

    Endangered Minds sounds great.
    Thanks for your post.

    • Reply Brandy Vencel June 8, 2013 at 5:38 am

      Endangered Minds *is* great! I highly recommend it. 🙂

  • Reply Dawn May 24, 2013 at 11:51 am

    Another home run on this post, Brandy!I found myself yelling “Amen!” after many sentences, but the ones that I found to be particularly profound in their simplicity were these:
    “She had a knack for truth.”
    “…so much {and yet so little} is asked of young children today.”
    Correlating the quotes is very telling. I had intended to catalogue something similar throughout my reading of Endangered Minds but they are so supportive of each other that it became an exhausting enterprise. That will be a project for another day – on the second read, perhaps.

    I, too, would love to see the current tech issues specifically addressed. Didn’t know Healy had such a recent book. Will have to look into it as a future read.

    Thanks for this, Brandy. Magnificent!

  • Reply Anonymous May 24, 2013 at 1:36 am

    I began reading it as well, and it is good! I wish she had something more recent, as I would love to hear her thoughts about texting, facebook, smartphones. Of course, I know it is more of the same, but I just found myself wishing it was more up to date to be able to share with all of the parents around me that I see entertaining their two year olds with Ipads.

    Julie in St. Louis

    • Reply Brandy Vencel May 24, 2013 at 3:53 am

      I have Failure to Connect, which touches on some of the technology issues, but isn’t as current as needed. It at least touches on computers and the Internet, but I completely agree! She has a 2011 book called Different Learners and I wonder if she talks about it at all in that book?

      The iPad/toddler issue concerns me greatly!

  • Reply amy May 23, 2013 at 2:47 pm

    Love that book! So much good information in it.

  • Leave a Reply